Central Michigan
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
237  Nate Ghena JR 32:17
498  Silas DeKalita JR 32:51
778  Ben Wynsma SR 33:18
858  Spencer Nousain SO 33:27
940  Ethan Lievense SR 33:33
1,229  Joseph Emmanuel FR 33:58
1,385  Alec Toreki FR 34:09
1,488  Monte Scott JR 34:18
1,548  Tanner Pesonen SR 34:23
1,648  Casey Voisin SO 34:30
2,203  Nathan Huff SR 35:21
National Rank #90 of 311
Great Lakes Region Rank #12 of 31
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 13th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 21.6%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Nate Ghena Silas DeKalita Ben Wynsma Spencer Nousain Ethan Lievense Joseph Emmanuel Alec Toreki Monte Scott Tanner Pesonen Casey Voisin Nathan Huff
Roy Griak Invitational 09/27 961 31:59 32:42 33:41 34:14 32:48 35:58 35:08 34:28 34:18 38:45 35:21
Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) 10/03 1011 32:25 32:38 33:08 33:35 33:20 33:52 34:53 34:17
ISU Pre-National Invitational (White Race) 10/18 997 32:12 32:43 33:29 33:38 34:23 34:34 33:10
MAC Championship 11/01 1041 32:22 32:56 33:15 33:24 34:06 34:12 34:13 33:51 34:20
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/14 1012 32:19 33:16 32:52 33:14 33:20 33:50 34:03





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 11.9 344 0.0 0.3 1.2 3.2 6.2 10.7 17.1 21.6 24.8 8.7 3.7 1.6 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Nate Ghena 4.4% 129.3


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Nate Ghena 28.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.3 1.7 2.2 2.4 2.8 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.8
Silas DeKalita 51.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Ben Wynsma 74.8
Spencer Nousain 83.7
Ethan Lievense 90.9
Joseph Emmanuel 119.5
Alec Toreki 129.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 0.0% 0.0 5
6 0.3% 0.3 6
7 1.2% 1.2 7
8 3.2% 3.2 8
9 6.2% 6.2 9
10 10.7% 10.7 10
11 17.1% 17.1 11
12 21.6% 21.6 12
13 24.8% 24.8 13
14 8.7% 8.7 14
15 3.7% 3.7 15
16 1.6% 1.6 16
17 0.5% 0.5 17
18 0.2% 0.2 18
19 0.1% 0.1 19
20 0.0% 0.0 20
21 0.0% 0.0 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Texas-Arlington 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0